SURPRISE, SURPRISE, SURPRISE
I'M BACK
SOMEONE IS TRYING TO DESTROY MY TULIPS
Seems someone or group of individuals are still out to destroy my beautiful Tulips -- well it is NOT going to happen!! I use the best pesticide on the market, and I definitely will do anything and everything in my power to protect my beautiful Tulips from the evil, ill intended people out there who are burning up inside with envy because of my beautiful Tulips!
*****************************
NanaNC and tinker_bell_1967, by way of their tag lines on PalTalk's Pal List, have been advertising a Blog recently put up on blogger.com trying to "prove" that Tulips_29 is one and the same as KariSueBee. Now I would have to admit that I do make claim to at least half (1/2) of the person that Tulips_29 is, but for me to make claim she is 100% ME would not be fair to the sperm donor. Oh for sure the behavior exhibited by Tulips_29 in the IM screen shots between her and SweetPea14 is behavior that MUST be attributable solely to the gene pool from the sperm donor's side of the family and definitely NOT mine (wink, wink). ANYWAY.......
Was I saddened to see such talk from my Tulips - YES, OF COURSE. Can I understand why she initiated and said what she did in that IM with SweetPea14 - ABSOLUTELY. Will I hold anything what she said in that IM session with SweetPea14 against her - ABSOLUTELY NOT. Did she disrespect SweetPea14 - heck NO, SweetPea14 deserves NO respect from Tulips_29 considering all that has transpired as far as Tulips_29 is concerned in this whole ordeal -- none of them deserve respect IMO. However, were it to have been an IM session, chat room exchange, forum comment, blog comment with anyone else who is NOT a part of this whole Internet smear campaign and who has NOT targeted her, harassed her, stalked her, spread vicious and damaging lies about her, OR if it were an innocent individual in all of this or otherwise, then I would have much difficulty with it and would have to accept responsibility for failing her miserably somewhere along the way.
Tulips_29 took it upon herself to do what she felt she had every right to do, considering the circumstances. I applaud her in her efforts to stand up for herself, to fight back in whatever way she deems necessary in order to get answers/information relating to her attackers, of which SweetPea14 is one of them. We all need to learn NOT to allow people to get away with taking advantage of us with their bullying, harassing, intimidating and threatening tactics. Tulips_29 now has had a good dose of reality of the types of people to look out for as she starts her new journey in life, i.e. from that of a teenager to that of an adult. She now knows that indeed she must always watch out for that wolf in sheep's clothing no matter what the situation. She now knows that those wolves disguised as sheep even pop up in chat rooms, blogs and forums discussing missing/ kidnapped/murdered children - all the while pretending, PRETENDING, to care and proclaim that they are advocates for the safety and well being of children.
What I do find interesting right away after reading the IM screen shots endorsed by NanaNC and tinker_bell_1967, is that once again (as in the case of Murt and his infamous IM session with STDBDOP0102), it is ONLY Tulips_29 who MUST be painted as having the filthy mouth and NOT poor little innocent SweetPea14. Must ONLY Tulips_29 be held accountable for her words - I DON'T THINK SO!! I find it equally, if not more so, disgusting for an ADULT who is way over the age of 18 (who very well might be a MOTHER herself, perhaps even a GRANDMOTHER) to use such language than what I do coming from a young woman who has just entered adulthood by mere weeks/ months. Tulips_29's age alone affords her an excuse for her immature words, but SweetPea14 being the older woman should have been the one more MATURE in her way of talking, and definitely in her way of thinking during that IM exchange. Perhaps Tulips_29 used the opportunity of the IM exchange as her cross over into adulthood, kind of like how some young adults do when they become of legal age to drink and go night clubbing -- they over indulge, thinking they have to prove something to themselves as well as others. Perhaps Tulips_29 just simply had had enough. She has been targeted for months, she had every right and she does not need to explain anything to me, not even WHY she used my email address - I fully understand. Tulips_29, as an adult now has the responsibility to protect herself and she has to also learn that whatever choices she makes in life, she also has to live with the consequences.
I understand fully why Tulips_29 would have made contact with SweetPea14 after all what SweetPea14 and her fellow cohorts have tried to do and have done to her the past 8 months, culminating with all of them snooping around her Facebook Account and spreading vicious untruths about her, her boyfriend and me. Why should Tulips_29 suffer all the name calling and lies being spread by any of them as a result of THEIR inability to fully comprehend and follow along with what they read on her Facebook Wall. Good grief I have never even taken it upon myself to invade her little private piece of cyberspace!! The bigger question and concern is: Why are adult women like SweetPea14 and her fellow cohorts snooping around and preying on young men and women on their Facebook accounts?
Tulips_29 took it upon herself to do what she felt she had every right to do, considering the circumstances. I applaud her in her efforts to stand up for herself, to fight back in whatever way she deems necessary in order to get answers/information relating to her attackers, of which SweetPea14 is one of them. We all need to learn NOT to allow people to get away with taking advantage of us with their bullying, harassing, intimidating and threatening tactics. Tulips_29 now has had a good dose of reality of the types of people to look out for as she starts her new journey in life, i.e. from that of a teenager to that of an adult. She now knows that indeed she must always watch out for that wolf in sheep's clothing no matter what the situation. She now knows that those wolves disguised as sheep even pop up in chat rooms, blogs and forums discussing missing/ kidnapped/murdered children - all the while pretending, PRETENDING, to care and proclaim that they are advocates for the safety and well being of children.
What I do find interesting right away after reading the IM screen shots endorsed by NanaNC and tinker_bell_1967, is that once again (as in the case of Murt and his infamous IM session with STDBDOP0102), it is ONLY Tulips_29 who MUST be painted as having the filthy mouth and NOT poor little innocent SweetPea14. Must ONLY Tulips_29 be held accountable for her words - I DON'T THINK SO!! I find it equally, if not more so, disgusting for an ADULT who is way over the age of 18 (who very well might be a MOTHER herself, perhaps even a GRANDMOTHER) to use such language than what I do coming from a young woman who has just entered adulthood by mere weeks/ months. Tulips_29's age alone affords her an excuse for her immature words, but SweetPea14 being the older woman should have been the one more MATURE in her way of talking, and definitely in her way of thinking during that IM exchange. Perhaps Tulips_29 used the opportunity of the IM exchange as her cross over into adulthood, kind of like how some young adults do when they become of legal age to drink and go night clubbing -- they over indulge, thinking they have to prove something to themselves as well as others. Perhaps Tulips_29 just simply had had enough. She has been targeted for months, she had every right and she does not need to explain anything to me, not even WHY she used my email address - I fully understand. Tulips_29, as an adult now has the responsibility to protect herself and she has to also learn that whatever choices she makes in life, she also has to live with the consequences.
I understand fully why Tulips_29 would have made contact with SweetPea14 after all what SweetPea14 and her fellow cohorts have tried to do and have done to her the past 8 months, culminating with all of them snooping around her Facebook Account and spreading vicious untruths about her, her boyfriend and me. Why should Tulips_29 suffer all the name calling and lies being spread by any of them as a result of THEIR inability to fully comprehend and follow along with what they read on her Facebook Wall. Good grief I have never even taken it upon myself to invade her little private piece of cyberspace!! The bigger question and concern is: Why are adult women like SweetPea14 and her fellow cohorts snooping around and preying on young men and women on their Facebook accounts?
Another interesting point is (and I do give Tulips_29 a great deal of credit here for going right to the source and dealing one on one with someone who got her ire up) she obviously must have had good reason that day to initiate the IM session with SweetPea14. She was provoked because of the tag line SweetPea14 had behind her name on PalTalk's Pal List. She has been trashed, lied about, falsely accused and targeted especially by ones like Zanlaughsatyou (via Twitter), CrazyCajun (via the audio recording found on my Blog), Mommiesdollies1 (via her IM with me and shown on this Blog), SheWolfRocks (via her comments here, there and everywhere), and yes SweetPea14 too (via her tag lines on PalTalk) and all the others in that group who go around signing as Anonymous on comments here and there trashing her like the cowards they are. Is Tulips_29 a SLUT - NO, quite the contrary as a matter of fact! Has Tulips_29 given birth out of wedlock to a son - NO! Am I a Grandma - NO! Did I send my Tulips off somewhere and did horrible things to her because she got pregnant (as rumored all over the Internet especially by SheWolfRocks) - NO! Has Murt done disgusting sex acts with Tulips_29 with or without my permission - ABSOLUTELY NOT. Only seriously sick perverted women would say such things and spread the same all over the Internet about a young woman just entering adulthood. Only seriously sick perverted women would target someone who they do not even know. Only seriously sick perverted women would target someone who they have not had any dealings with, and who was NOT involved in this Internet smear campaign against Murt, me and others until she became one of their targets! And why was Tulips_29 targeted by SweetPea14 and her fellow cohorts -- simply because she accompanied her mother to meet Murt and have dinner with him at Red Lobster. They either did not approve of us meeting and having dinner with Murt and jealousy was burning all of them up inside OR it angered them that I would be so bold to do as I saw fit without seeking their permission before hand!
Interesting is the first sentence of the IM session started out with Tulips_29 saying to SweetPea14: "8:33 poking fun of the elderly again bitch". We all know how SweetPea14 and all the others (who have all previously been discussed by me on my Blog) call the elderly women who follow(ed) Murt disparaging names, have wished ill upon them, threatened physical harm to them, mocked them, and have even wished DEATH upon them. I can fully appreciate that that alone would be something that would have upset Tulips_29 - especially considering the fact that she has personally met one of the women targeted in real life, and she has spoken/chatted a number of times with another of the women targeted, both whom she likes and cares for a lot. Tulips_29 obviously has been paying very close attention to the situation since being dragged into it 8 months ago, whether it be by keeping up with all the blogs, or by cruising the halls of PalTalk under whatever nick name she chose , and under whatever email address she chose as well. Tulips_29 noticed all the "tag lines" being put behind certain nick names of the "players" in this whole ordeal, like SweetPea14, and when it became evident that such tag lines were indeed directed at her and/or me, and the tag lines confirmed to her that ones like SweetPea14, midnite01, MOMMIESDOLLIES1 and tinker_bell_1967 were snooping around on her Facebook Account, she obviously just simply had had enough.
The IM session was between Tulips_29 and SweetPea14, one on one, private so no one had to know what was said between the two of them, certainly not the whole of cyberspace. To my knowledge Tulips_29 has not started up a Blog for the sole purpose of bashing SweetPea14, or anyone else, nor has she LIED or levied false accusations and allegations against anyone and spread the same all over the Internet. She did not just randomly target SweetPea14 that day, she had been provoked over and over again into doing so, and more importantly she kept the IM exchange between her and SweetPea14 private, even from me, despite how the IM also paints SweetPea14, a supposed mature adult woman. Seems to me SweetPea14 should be very upset, or very dumb, to allow the IM screen shots to be put out there on a Blog for all to see -- screen shots which expose her for the foul mouth and sick mind that she is. SweetPea14 is the one who obviously has been a FAKE all along from way back in Murt's chat room, whereas Tulips_29 has never been in Murt's chat room to my knowledge. SweetPea14 is the big over grown adult woman, whereas Tulips was 17 when they all directed their attention at her, to get to me, simply because I dared to stand up for myself and Murt, initially, over 1 year ago.
Again at 8:53 tulips_29 says to SweetPea14 "who is the Grandma u poking fun of today bitch". Not hard to understand why Tulips_29 would first assume that perhaps SweetPea14 was referring to her own Grandma and thus asked questions, out of concern (whether legit or not) according to the screen shots of the IM discussing SweetPea14's Grandma. Tulips_29 then even apologized to SweetPea14 for saying she had the big STD "S". What is offensive is what SweetPea14 accused Tulips_29 of, and what she accused Tulips_29's dad of doing to her and teaching her. That is very troubling that SweetPea14 would go down that road, considering what she has always maintained while following Murt for months and months and participating in the discussions in his chat room relating to children and them being preyed upon by sick perverted adults. It is Tulips_29 who has been a victim in all of this just as so many other innocent people have and all at the behest of PrincessBH aka Alexandria Goddard and no one else. How pathetic the rest of Princess' brain dead groupies look - ruining their own reputations and characters all the while making sure that hers is not tarnished in any way, shape or form.
Interesting is the first sentence of the IM session started out with Tulips_29 saying to SweetPea14: "8:33 poking fun of the elderly again bitch". We all know how SweetPea14 and all the others (who have all previously been discussed by me on my Blog) call the elderly women who follow(ed) Murt disparaging names, have wished ill upon them, threatened physical harm to them, mocked them, and have even wished DEATH upon them. I can fully appreciate that that alone would be something that would have upset Tulips_29 - especially considering the fact that she has personally met one of the women targeted in real life, and she has spoken/chatted a number of times with another of the women targeted, both whom she likes and cares for a lot. Tulips_29 obviously has been paying very close attention to the situation since being dragged into it 8 months ago, whether it be by keeping up with all the blogs, or by cruising the halls of PalTalk under whatever nick name she chose , and under whatever email address she chose as well. Tulips_29 noticed all the "tag lines" being put behind certain nick names of the "players" in this whole ordeal, like SweetPea14, and when it became evident that such tag lines were indeed directed at her and/or me, and the tag lines confirmed to her that ones like SweetPea14, midnite01, MOMMIESDOLLIES1 and tinker_bell_1967 were snooping around on her Facebook Account, she obviously just simply had had enough.
The IM session was between Tulips_29 and SweetPea14, one on one, private so no one had to know what was said between the two of them, certainly not the whole of cyberspace. To my knowledge Tulips_29 has not started up a Blog for the sole purpose of bashing SweetPea14, or anyone else, nor has she LIED or levied false accusations and allegations against anyone and spread the same all over the Internet. She did not just randomly target SweetPea14 that day, she had been provoked over and over again into doing so, and more importantly she kept the IM exchange between her and SweetPea14 private, even from me, despite how the IM also paints SweetPea14, a supposed mature adult woman. Seems to me SweetPea14 should be very upset, or very dumb, to allow the IM screen shots to be put out there on a Blog for all to see -- screen shots which expose her for the foul mouth and sick mind that she is. SweetPea14 is the one who obviously has been a FAKE all along from way back in Murt's chat room, whereas Tulips_29 has never been in Murt's chat room to my knowledge. SweetPea14 is the big over grown adult woman, whereas Tulips was 17 when they all directed their attention at her, to get to me, simply because I dared to stand up for myself and Murt, initially, over 1 year ago.
Again at 8:53 tulips_29 says to SweetPea14 "who is the Grandma u poking fun of today bitch". Not hard to understand why Tulips_29 would first assume that perhaps SweetPea14 was referring to her own Grandma and thus asked questions, out of concern (whether legit or not) according to the screen shots of the IM discussing SweetPea14's Grandma. Tulips_29 then even apologized to SweetPea14 for saying she had the big STD "S". What is offensive is what SweetPea14 accused Tulips_29 of, and what she accused Tulips_29's dad of doing to her and teaching her. That is very troubling that SweetPea14 would go down that road, considering what she has always maintained while following Murt for months and months and participating in the discussions in his chat room relating to children and them being preyed upon by sick perverted adults. It is Tulips_29 who has been a victim in all of this just as so many other innocent people have and all at the behest of PrincessBH aka Alexandria Goddard and no one else. How pathetic the rest of Princess' brain dead groupies look - ruining their own reputations and characters all the while making sure that hers is not tarnished in any way, shape or form.
For me the most troubling part of the whole IM session had between Tulips_29 and SweetPea14 is when between 8:55 and 8:56 of the conversation, SweetPea14 says "i dont pray". YOU DON'T PRAY SWEETPEA14 and that is your choice, but to me it is obvious and explains so very much about your behavior and how you take such delight in partaking in all that has happened over the course of the past several months! You SweetPea14 along with your fellow cohorts obviously have NO conscience, heart nor compassion for your fellow man to be able to do what all of you have done day in and day out the past couple years. It is obvious you believe that you have no Higher Power to answer to, except of course for your PRINCESSBH, the ruler over you.
How uncomfortable it must have been for you SweetPea14 to be in Murt's chat room at a time when ALL we practically did was pray. We prayed that little Caylee would be found alive. We prayed for her remains to be found. We prayed that whoever was responsible for her death would be found and thrown in jail. We prayed for all who were feeling pain from the loss of her in their lives. When Murt took us on the road trip to the Memorial Site where little Caylee's remains were found, we prayed and prayed - a lot that day. We have prayed and prayed and prayed ever since that day, that little Caylee will receive the JUSTICE she so deserves. We prayed for little Haleigh, little Adji, and other children who had gone missing and whose fate was unknown. We even prayed for our fellow "roomies" in Murt's room during their sickness, loss, pain. At the date of the IM session with Tulips_29 you claimed SweetPea14 that you don't pray - hmmmm, odd as just about 6 months prior to that you apparently did pray, as evidenced by the following comment you left in Murt's room on July 28th, 2009, so which is the truth SweetPea14:-
(12:25 PM) SweetPea14: hi all...wow...prayers for L**
No surprise that Murt's chat room was destroyed, it was bound to happen once PRAYER was booted out of there!
It is both amazing and troubling that ones like SweetPea14 demand their Rights and Freedoms but all they do is infringe upon the Rights and Freedoms of others. SweetPea14 along with all of her fellow cohorts have done everything within their power the past 12+ months to DENY those of us who do not agree with them, for whatever reason, OUR RIGHTS to:
1. Freedom of Choice/Expression (which includes: (1) choosing to do with our hard earned money as we dang well please; (2) choosing to go anywhere and knowing what to expect as opposed to being subjected to disrespectful behavior unexpectedly);
2. Freedom of Association (which includes following/spending time with/breaking bread with anyone we choose whether it be in cyberspace or in real life and not fear being targeted by others simply because they do not approve of the same);
3. Freedom of Speech (which includes voicing our opinions and/or standing up to DEFEND ourselves against anyone who spreads vicious lies about us, who pokes fun of us, who interferes/ harasses/disrupts us, and who stalks us and for NO other reason/purpose other than to cause harm and/or to inflict emotional, mental and/or psychological pain as a means of their entertainment, and simply because we dare to disagree and to defend ourselves against our attackers);
4. Freedom of Religion (which includes any form of worship to God we choose without being mocked and without being held to a much higher standard by those who choose to be non-believers and think they are a god);
5. Freedom of Expression (which includes by any means we choose to get our point across WITHOUT directly trampling on the rights and freedoms of another innocent person or group without cause or reason ) .
I pray SweetPea14 but does that mean that I think I am any better than anyone else - NO it does NOT but I certainly am not as horrible and disgusting as you and the others in your little group, and neither is Tulips_29. Do I go around quoting Bible scriptures or forcing my belief in God on anyone else - NO I do NOT. Do I go around for 6 days out the week causing trouble and instigating crap for the sole purpose of inflicting pain in others one way or the other and then talk about having to go to Church on Sunday - NO I do NOT. Do I go on and on about the Bible Study chat room(s) on PalTalk that I visit - NO I do NOT. It is you SweetPea14 and the rest of you who have instigated all that has happened the past 8+ months, and it is ones like me, Tulips_29, Murt and others who have been forced to defend ourselves, not the other way around! No matter what you all do you will NEVER be able to twist the truth because the real TRUTH NEVER LIES and the EVIDENCE proves it!
How uncomfortable it must have been for you SweetPea14 to be in Murt's chat room at a time when ALL we practically did was pray. We prayed that little Caylee would be found alive. We prayed for her remains to be found. We prayed that whoever was responsible for her death would be found and thrown in jail. We prayed for all who were feeling pain from the loss of her in their lives. When Murt took us on the road trip to the Memorial Site where little Caylee's remains were found, we prayed and prayed - a lot that day. We have prayed and prayed and prayed ever since that day, that little Caylee will receive the JUSTICE she so deserves. We prayed for little Haleigh, little Adji, and other children who had gone missing and whose fate was unknown. We even prayed for our fellow "roomies" in Murt's room during their sickness, loss, pain. At the date of the IM session with Tulips_29 you claimed SweetPea14 that you don't pray - hmmmm, odd as just about 6 months prior to that you apparently did pray, as evidenced by the following comment you left in Murt's room on July 28th, 2009, so which is the truth SweetPea14:-
(12:25 PM) SweetPea14: hi all...wow...prayers for L**
No surprise that Murt's chat room was destroyed, it was bound to happen once PRAYER was booted out of there!
It is both amazing and troubling that ones like SweetPea14 demand their Rights and Freedoms but all they do is infringe upon the Rights and Freedoms of others. SweetPea14 along with all of her fellow cohorts have done everything within their power the past 12+ months to DENY those of us who do not agree with them, for whatever reason, OUR RIGHTS to:
1. Freedom of Choice/Expression (which includes: (1) choosing to do with our hard earned money as we dang well please; (2) choosing to go anywhere and knowing what to expect as opposed to being subjected to disrespectful behavior unexpectedly);
2. Freedom of Association (which includes following/spending time with/breaking bread with anyone we choose whether it be in cyberspace or in real life and not fear being targeted by others simply because they do not approve of the same);
3. Freedom of Speech (which includes voicing our opinions and/or standing up to DEFEND ourselves against anyone who spreads vicious lies about us, who pokes fun of us, who interferes/ harasses/disrupts us, and who stalks us and for NO other reason/purpose other than to cause harm and/or to inflict emotional, mental and/or psychological pain as a means of their entertainment, and simply because we dare to disagree and to defend ourselves against our attackers);
4. Freedom of Religion (which includes any form of worship to God we choose without being mocked and without being held to a much higher standard by those who choose to be non-believers and think they are a god);
5. Freedom of Expression (which includes by any means we choose to get our point across WITHOUT directly trampling on the rights and freedoms of another innocent person or group without cause or reason ) .
EXERCISING ONES RIGHTS DOES NOT MEAN YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO TOTALLY DISREGARD AND INFRINGE UPON THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS
I pray SweetPea14 but does that mean that I think I am any better than anyone else - NO it does NOT but I certainly am not as horrible and disgusting as you and the others in your little group, and neither is Tulips_29. Do I go around quoting Bible scriptures or forcing my belief in God on anyone else - NO I do NOT. Do I go around for 6 days out the week causing trouble and instigating crap for the sole purpose of inflicting pain in others one way or the other and then talk about having to go to Church on Sunday - NO I do NOT. Do I go on and on about the Bible Study chat room(s) on PalTalk that I visit - NO I do NOT. It is you SweetPea14 and the rest of you who have instigated all that has happened the past 8+ months, and it is ones like me, Tulips_29, Murt and others who have been forced to defend ourselves, not the other way around! No matter what you all do you will NEVER be able to twist the truth because the real TRUTH NEVER LIES and the EVIDENCE proves it!
For the record, I did not bring my beautiful Tulips into this internet and real life smear campaign initiated by PrincessBH and her fellow Beaconhell crew - YOU did SweetPea14, along with all the rest of you - YOU all crossed that line, not me, and both the PROOF and the TRUTH are on my/our side. Obviously Tulips_29 paid very close attention to the goings on in this ordeal over the past 8 months - she obviously learned the NATURE OF THE BEAST very well. I did not bring my beautiful Tulips into this but I will be damned if I will just sit back and do absolutely nothing while she is viciously attacked and trashed by the likes of all of you scumbags! I do not think there is a MOTHER and/or FATHER out there who would just sit idly by while their child is being attacked the way my Tulips has been, whether it be in cyberspace or in real life!
NanaNC, tinker_bell_1967 and SweetPea14 and whoever else, for your information the nick names listed under my email address as shown in the screen shot on your Blog are all mine and have been used by me on PalTalk with the exception of Tulips_29 and OhioMommaBaby. Accuse me of something you have using the nick names that belong to me on that list in future. Do any of you from hell deserve an explanation as to why I created any of the nick names used on PalTalk - hell NO you don't, hate to say this but it really is not any of your business. I did it because........I CAN. Does Tulips_29 owe anyone of you an explanation as to why she used her mother's email address - hell NO she doesn't, hate to say this but that too, is really none of your business. She did it because.......SHE CAN. Have I harassed anyone for NO reason at all while using any of the nick names of mine - NO not to my knowledge but I will stand corrected if "the evidence" is shown to prove otherwise. Not too far fetched to grasp the connection between MY EMAIL and MY DAUGHTER which makes it OUR BUSINESS. THE JOKE IS STILL ON ALL OF YOU BECAUSE EVEN THOUGH WE ARE NOW PLAYING BY YOUR RULES, WE HAVE YET TO STOOP AS LOW AS ANY OF YOU HAVE ON A DAILY BASIS. CHALK IT UP TO BEING OUT SMARTED BY A VERY YOUNG WOMAN TRYING TO DEFEND HERSELF - PERIOD!
An FYI: I DO NOT, as a rule, post comments on any blogs anywhere using Anonymous for the purpose of hiding or deceiving anyone. When I did post an Anonymous comment on Murts Blog, I owned up to it in a past comment on this Blog to Rebecca Sowerby, search my Blog to find it. If anyone has the real hard proof that I have indeed posted as Anonymous anywhere (as I continuously am accused of doing), then please by all means set me straight - I welcome it. If I am satisfied that I did make the comment, I will definitely own up to it, otherwise we only need consider the source of the accusations. Common sense will dictate that since I have a Blog, containing what my Blog contains relating to this whole ordeal where I use my real name and/or my nick name on PalTalk then what reason would I have to post comments anywhere as anonymous -- only fakes and cowards do that OR ones who have very good reason to do it because of the fear factor - thanks to all of you from Beaconhell (which I totally agree with and understand). If I have an opinion worth voicing on something and want my voice to be heard, going anonymous does NOT achieve that, now does it -- a little common sense goes a long way here folks!! When I had good reason to initiate IMs with certain ones like midnite01, NanaNC, Mommiesdollies1, tinker_bell_1967, PrincessBH and whoever else I may have up to this point, I did, and I did so using KariSueBee.
NanaNC and/or tinker_bell_1967 would you provide the proof evidencing where on Huffington Post you obtained my email address as mentioned on that Blog the both of you endorse. If I am not mistaken, the screen shot that PrincessBH had posted all over the place connecting me to my email address was from a different site entirely, a male individual's site who is familiar with one of your good buddies, hmmmmm. I really do not recall ever posting my Email address out in the open on Huffington Post -- jog my memory please NanaNC and/or tinker_bell_1967. Failing your being able to produce such proof, please add that LIE to the very long list of LIES you all are spreading on this here Internet about me.
P.S. SweetPea14 FYI, you are wrong, JerseyMom123 will accept money from me if/when I am handing it out - she told me as much in an IM I had with her weeks back -- so there, as usual NONE OF YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!!
